Abstract Details

Title Acute Treatment Optimization Influences Disability and Quality of Life in Migraine: Results of the ObserVational survey of the Epidemiology, tReatment and Care Of MigrainE (OVERCOME) Study

Topic Headache

Presentation(s) S1 - Headache 1 (1:24 PM-1:36 PM)

Poster/Presentation
Number 003

Background Acute treatments for migraine attacks are considered optimized when they resolve pain and restore function. Optimized acute treatment for migraine should be associated with less disability and better HRQoL in people with migraine.

Objective Assess the influence of acute treatment optimization and migraine related disability and health related quality of life (HRQoL) across monthly Migraine Headache Day (MHD) categories from the OVERCOME study.

Design/Methods OVERCOME is a web-based survey conducted in a representative US sample. The current sample, collected in Spring 2019, included 20,041 people meeting ICHD-3 criteria for migraine who completed measures of acute treatment optimization (Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire [mTOQ]), disability (Migraine Disability Assessment Scale [MIDAS], and HRQoL (Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, Role Function – Restrictive subscale [MSQ-RFR]). This analysis examined the relationship between mTOQ, MIDAS, and MSQ-RFR across MHDs per month categories (0-3, 4-7, 8-14, ≥15 MHDs). One-way ANOVA or Chi-square test, stratified by MHD category, evaluated differences between mTOQ groups (p < .05)

Results For the whole cohort of 20,041 respondents, mean(SD) age was 42.5(14.9) years, 74.9% were female, and 72.1% were non-Hispanic white. Among the 3,938 respondents with 4-7 MHDs per month, 60.1% of those with very poor treatment optimization had severe MIDAS disability as opposed to only 19.5% of those with maximum treatment optimization (p < .001). In this group, those with very poor treatment optimization had significantly lower MSQ-RFR scores, Mean= 32.0 (SD 22.8) relative to those with maximum treatment optimization, Mean= 63.4 (SD 20.7) (p < .001). Significant differences in MIDAS and MSQ-RFR by treatment optimization were observed across all other MHD cohorts (i.e. 0-3, 8-14, ≥15; all p < .001).

Conclusions When acute migraine treatment is optimized, people with migraine report lower levels of disability and better health related quality of life.

Authors/Disclosures
Dawn C. Buse, PhD (Dawn C. Buse, PhD) PRESENTER	Dr. Buse has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Vector Psychometric Group. Dr. Buse has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Abbvie-Allergan. Dr. Buse has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Amgen. Dr. Buse has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Lilly. Dr. Buse has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Lundbeck. Dr. Buse has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Teva. Dr. Buse has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Theranicsa. Dr. Buse has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Lilly. Dr. Buse has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Abbvie-Allergan. Dr. Buse has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Lundbeck. Dr. Buse has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for Current Pain and Headache Reports. The institution of Dr. Buse has received research support from Amgen. The institution of Dr. Buse has received research support from FDA. The institution of Dr. Buse has received research support from National Headache Foundation.
	No disclosure on file
Robert A. Nicholson, PhD (Eli Lilly & Company)	Dr. Nicholson has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Eli Lilly & Company. Dr. Nicholson has stock in Eli Lilly & Company. Dr. Nicholson has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care.
Erin G. Doty, MD (Eli Lilly and Company)	Dr. Doty has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Eli Lilly and Company, USA. Dr. Doty has stock in Eli Lilly and Company, USA.
	No disclosure on file
Sait Ashina, MD (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School)	Dr. Ashina has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Eli Lilly. Dr. Ashina has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Allergan/Abbvie. Dr. Ashina has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Theranica. Dr. Ashina has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Linpharma. Dr. Ashina has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Teva. Dr. Ashina has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Lundbeck. Dr. Ashina has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Pfizer.
Michael L. Reed, PhD (Vedanta Research)	The institution of Dr. Reed has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Eli Lilly. The institution of Dr. Reed has received research support from Allergan. The institution of Dr. Reed has received research support from Dr Reddy's Labs/Promius. The institution of Dr. Reed has received research support from Allay Lamp. Dr. Reed has a non-compensated relationship as a Research Analyst with National Headache Foundation that is relevant to AAN interests or activities.
Robert E. Shapiro, MD, PhD, FAAN (Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont)	Dr. Shapiro has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Lilly. Dr. Shapiro has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Lilly. Dr. Shapiro has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Theranica. Dr. Shapiro has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as an officer or member of the Board of Directors for Headache Cooperative of New England. Dr. Shapiro has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for EEOC.
	No disclosure on file
Richard B. Lipton, MD, FAAN (Albert Einstein College of Medicine)	Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Allergan/Abbvie. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Amgen. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biohaven. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $50,000-$99,999 for serving as a Consultant for Eli Lilly. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Lundbeck. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Teva. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Vedanta. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Merck. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Grifols. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Pfizer. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Axon. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Satsuma. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Genentech. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Cool Tech. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for BDSI. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Linpharma. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Axsome. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Clexio. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Shiratronics. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Allergan/Abbvie. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biohaven. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Eli Lilly. Dr. Lipton has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Lundbeck. Dr. Lipton has stock in Biohaven. Dr. Lipton has stock in Manistee. Dr. Lipton has stock in Axon. Dr. Lipton has stock in CoolTech. The institution of Dr. Lipton has received research support from Teva. The institution of Dr. Lipton has received research support from Amgen. The institution of Dr. Lipton has received research support from Allergan/Abbvie. The institution of Dr. Lipton has received research support from Gammacore. The institution of Dr. Lipton has received research support from Axsome. The institution of Dr. Lipton has received research support from Charleston Labs. The institution of Dr. Lipton has received research support from Eli Lilly. The institution of Dr. Lipton has received research support from Satsuma. The institution of Dr. Lipton has received research support from NIH . The institution of Dr. Lipton has received research support from Veterans Administration. Dr. Lipton has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care.

��ɫ��

��ɫ��